PSI Blog 20220228 How the religious assumption of perfectly empty space results in the belief in “time dilation”
Thanks to Dr. Abhishek Chakravartty for his attempt to
understand one of the contradictions stemming from Einstein’s particle theory
of light. Regressives and reformists have struggled with this problem for over
a century. Einstein’s major ad hoc assumed light was a particle with constant
velocity, but only waves can have nearly constant
velocity. Abhi follows the usual Wikipedia explanation of time dilation and
then asks:
“So, if the speed of light is different from different
frames of reference, then among the wavelength and frequency of light, which
one varies from the frame of reference of the 2 systems and which one is
constant from both frames of reference? Can you also explain why?”
[GB: All this is moot because the proper frame of
reference is the medium. Regressives (who invariably assume light is a
particle) use such contradictions in relativity to claim there is time
dilation. By using the Lorentz Correction Factor, as I explained in IUT, the
proper geometric correction gives the same result for all points of observation
when the medium is used as the proper frame of reference. Thus, aside from the
tiny contribution from the cosmological redshift, velocity, wavelength, and
frequency do not change in an unchanging medium. Any time your measurements get
a different result, you need to take source and observer motions into account.
But then you would be violating relativity, which assumes there is no medium.
Einstein’s perfectly empty space assumption actually is the religious
foundation of creationism and the Big Bang Theory.[1]]
[1] Borchardt,
Glenn, 2020, Religious Roots of Relativity: Berkeley, California, Progressive
Science Institute, 160 p. [ https://go.glennborchardt.com/RRR-ebk ]
No comments:
Post a Comment