“JWST Sees More Galaxies than Expected”

 PSI Blog 20240219 “JWST Sees More Galaxies than Expected”

 

Excuses being made up for the “elderly galaxies” being found in the cosmogonical crib.

The galaxy CEERS-93316 was originally determined to date from 250 million years after the big bang. Astrophysicists have since revised this number to 1.2 billion years after the big bang. Photo credit: S. Jewell and C. Pollock/University of Edinburgh.

 

Thanks to George Coyne for this heads up. He says: “I thought you would find the recalculation of the age of the galaxy to be as amusing, unjustified and silly as I did.”

 

 

https://physics.aps.org/articles/v17/23?fbclid=IwAR1spJLTCBicncmQMv6Lc9lG_-1JX_vqMiOK357KNSelpeszC-uX8S8uk7Y

 

As most readers know, the Big Bang universe is supposed to be younger and younger as we look back in time. Not so…

 

More serious ad hocs (theoretical add-ons designed to save a faltering theory) are now appearing. First you do some recalculations. Then you hypothesize some never-before seen special properties to help maintain what is left of your theoretical mess.

 

Remember that is what Einstein did in his famously well received hypothesis that light was a particle and not a wave. The result was his “Untired Light Theory,” which assumes light is a massless particle filled with perfectly empty space traveling perpetually through perfectly empty space. There is no evidence for any of that, but it remains the foundation of the ridiculous expanding universe interpretation. The cosmological redshift is mostly a result of energy loss over distance, with very little of it being a result of the Doppler effect and none of it being the result of the magical >c expansion of perfectly empty space.

 

It's not my theory, so I haven’t studied the recalculations used to drop the redshift from what was once thought to be z=16.7 to z=4.9. But here is a salient quote from Katherine Wright’s article:

 

“So far, only about 10 of the high-redshift galaxies found in the initial JWST images have had spectroscopic follow-ups. Among them is CEERS-93316. That more detailed view led Donnan and his colleagues to revise the galaxy’s redshift down to 4.9, which came as a relief to the researchers. ‘If CEERS-93316 had kept its high redshift, that would have been very difficult to reconcile with the models,’ says Pablo Arrabal Haro, the lead researcher…”

 

Let’s all hope the “more detailed view” doesn’t lead to a recalc of our own Milky Way, which has been a proud 13.61 Ga (billions of years old) for quite some time.

 

We now have 23 falsifications of the Big Bang Theory. Most of those are ad hocs like the first one I listed,[1] which is a violation of the Fifth Assumption of Science, conservation (Matter and the motion of matter can be neither created nor destroyed). The ad hoc is the Fifth Assumption of Religion, creation (Matter and motion can be created out of nothing).

 

 

PSI Blog 20240219

 

Thanks for reading Infinite Universe Theory! On Medium.com you can subscribe for free to receive new posts and be part of the “Last Cosmological Revolution.”  There you can support PSI financially by clapping 50 times and responding with your questions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

[1] [That is the one David Balogun used to best Neil deGrasse Tyson in a short debate.] https://medium.com/@glennborchardt/nine-year-old-genius-calls-out-cosmogonist-neil-degrasse-tyson-on-the-falsity-of-the-big-bang-ec9ee58a27e5