Largest Cosmological Object Found—So Far

PSI Blog 20240226 Largest Cosmological Object Found—So Far

 

Infinity assumes the Infinite Universe has no “largest object.”

 

“An illustration of the recording-breaker quasar J059-4351, the bright core of a distant galaxy that is powered by a greedy supermassive black hole. (Image credit: ESO/M. Kornmesser)”

 

With infinity, the Eighth Assumption of Science, we claim the universe is infinite, both in the microcosmic and macrocosmic directions. In other words, not only are the constituents of the Infinite Universe infinitely divisible (as Aristotle claimed), but they also are infinitely integrable (additive). The records we keep are made to be broken, and Infinite Universe Theory predicts this will not long remain the largest cosmological object. 

 

“Brightest quasar ever seen is powered by black hole that eats a 'sun a day.'”

 

Here is a quote from Robert Lea’s article:

 

“A newly discovered quasar is a real record-breaker. Not only is it the brightest quasar ever seen, but it's also the brightest astronomical object in general ever seen. It's also powered by the hungriest and fastest-growing black hole ever seen — one that consumes the equivalent of over one sun's mass a day.

The quasar, J0529-4351, is located so far from Earth that its light has taken 12 billion years to reach us, meaning it is seen as it was when the 13.8 billion-year-old universe was just under 2 billion years old.

The supermassive black hole at the heart of the quasar is estimated to be between 17 billion and 19 billion times the mass of the sun; each year, it eats, or "accretes" the gas and dust equivalent to 370 solar masses. This makes J0529-4351 so luminous that if it were placed next to the sun, it would be 500 trillion times brighter than our brilliant star.”

 

Of course, this is just another case of an “Elderly Galaxy” being discovered in the cosmogonical crib falsifying the Big Bang Theory. A black hole 18 billion times the mass of the Sun and 500 trillion times as bright: Just imagine how long it would take for that to form! In order to fit the Big Bang Theory, the claim here is for it to be less than 2 billion years old. Our own 13.6-billion-year-old Milky Way has a black hole with a mass equivalent to 4.3 million Suns—which means that the black hole in this so-called “quasar” is 4186 times as big. At the Milky Way accretion rate, this would mean J0529-4350 is about 57 trillion years old!

 

One could invent an ad hoc assuming the accretion rate for this quasar was over 4186 times faster than the one for the Milky Way. That seems unlikely in view of what it takes to form a cosmological object in the first place. Like all objects in the Infinite Universe, it would have to exist in an environment containing sufficient ingredients. In general, those ingredients are complexes of matter formed from aether particles as explained in my “Infinite Universe Theory.”[1] Although the densities of the aether medium vary somewhat, I doubt it is anywhere near the 4186 times needed in this instance. The formation of anything proceeds one converging aether particle at a time. That is a lengthy process characteristic of evolution in general: the bigger a microcosm is, the longer it has taken to agglomerate. Cosmologists and other evolutionists observe this all the time. Thus, for instance, the tree in your backyard may form a 1-cm thick ring each year. But you would be shocked to find a 4186-cm thick ring after cutting it down. Cosmogonists are simply being super naïve in hypothesizing super-fast galactic development. Looks like they need to get out the office more. Barring that, maybe reading “Infinite Universe Theory” wouldn’t be a bad idea.

 

 

PSI Blog 20240226

 

Thanks for reading Infinite Universe Theory! On Medium.com you can subscribe for free to receive new posts and be part of the “Last Cosmological Revolution.”  There you can support PSI financially by clapping 50 times and responding with your questions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

[1] Borchardt, Glenn, 2017, Infinite Universe Theory: Berkeley, California, Progressive Science Institute, 337 p. [http://go.glennborchardt.com/IUTebook].