PSI Blog 20240513 Natural and “Artificial” Evolution
Understanding the universal mechanism of
evolution—univironmental determinism.
EVOLUTION
OF
EVERYTHING
Anon writes:
“Thank you:) I am very excited to see my question on your
blog and to see that climate change is worthy of integration of planetary
change and the Infinite Universe Theory on your blog. What effects will be seen on our planets in
conjunction with IUT?”
[GB: Welcome. Always like to answer your questions.]
“One Question:
As a Geologist as an original profession, could the
evidence of natural selection theorized by Darwin (who was also a Geologist)
and Wallace be interpreted through artificial selection?
Artificial Selection: Changes explained by natural
selection however due to exogenous manipulation through a biased third party on
a global scale (including weather patterns, tectonic shifts etc.) rather than
coincidental events.”
[GB: Actually, my Ph.D. was in Soil Science with minors
in geology and chemistry (Thesis was “Neutron activation analysis for
correlating volcanic ash soils”).
Remember that the universal mechanism of evolution is univironmental
determinism (what happens to a portion of the universe depends on the
infinite matter in motion within and without).[1]
Anything one deems “artificial,” “biased third party,” “coincidental,” or
otherwise “exogenous manipulation” is included in univironmental determinism
(UD). The Darwin-Wallace mechanism is called “neo-Darwinism,” but it is only a
special case involving biology. It only includes their “natural selection” and Mendel’s
genetics. Even so, I always thought it was quite naïve of folks who opposed
evolution while partaking of its benefits. Where did they think all those
wonderful dog breeds came from? Their ancestors (wolves) might be fine, but a
bit too large and carnivorous for most tiny apartments. On the farm, we partake
in evolution when we select the best cows and bulls for increasing milk
production. Our race horses are bred from thoroughbreds that may have
won races in the past.
Folks like to think they are “exogenous,” that is,
outside of nature. Sorry about that, but we definitely are part of nature. Per
UD, everything you see around you is “natural.” So, do we manipulate our
surroundings? Of course. Does cementifying whole cities warm the climate within
those cities? Of course. Do the oceans emit increased carbon dioxide when the
climate becomes warmer? Of course.
Your question is definitely apropos to Infinite Universe
Theory. The philosophy and mechanism (univironmental determinism) upon which it
is based assumes the evolution (motion) of each XYZ portion of the universe is
determined equally by the inside and outside of that portion. This means, of
course, that the universe has to be both microcosmically and macrocosmically infinite.
By using UD I was able to discover the cause of
gravitation and the production of the aetherosphere mentioned in the previous
Medium.com posts. Also, it is the 10-yr anniversary of our highly cited paper
on the cycles affecting Earth:
Puetz, S.J., Prokoph, Andreas, Borchardt, Glenn, and
Mason, E.W., 2014, Evidence of synchronous, decadal to billion-year cycles in
geological, genetic, and astronomical events: Chaos, Solitons & Fractals,
v. 62–63, no. 0, p. 55–75. [10.1016/j.chaos.2014.04.001].
Univironmental determinism brings us out of the myopism
that has always afflicted humanity. It is opposed to the 20th
century scientific world view, systems philosophy, which tends to overemphasize
“systems” while deemphasizing their environments. That is why the 300-year-old “attraction”
theory continued into the 21st century. It is why we are still
plagued with its archetype: the Big Bang Theory, with its explosion of everything out of nothing. It is time we rejected the myopism
that produced that silly idea. It is time to replace the Big Bang Theory with
the Infinite Universe Theory.]
Thanks for reading
Infinite Universe Theory! On Medium.com you can subscribe for free to receive
new posts and be part of the “Last Cosmological Revolution.” There you
can support PSI financially by clapping 50 times and responding with your
questions.
[1] Borchardt, Glenn, 2007, The Scientific Worldview:
Beyond Newton and Einstein: Lincoln, NE, iUniverse, 411 p.
[https://gborc.com/TSW07].
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment