PSI Blog 20240930 The Big Bang Scam
Thanks to Bill,
whose latest response was so great that we decided to present it as a Guest
Post in honor of his father:
The
Big Bang Scam
By
Bill Wesley, Arrayist
Notice that when they provide titles
such as, "The James Webb Observation Breaks Cosmology!" or " The
Big Bang Challenged by New Observations!" and so on the article itself
will spend all its text on wearily reiterating the standard cosmological model
for the 10,000th time and then will suggest that no one understands what’s
wrong, but that we should not give up on the standard cosmological model, that
it’s merely a problem of reexamining the dynamics of galaxy formation or some
other small tweak that someone will think of soon.
We are asked not to panic or jump to
conclusions, the titanic cosmological model has encountered a minor
obstetrical, will soon be fixed and that's all, we are reminded that cosmology
is unsinkable!
So it’s a scam, they are using the
title to reiterate what is not working yet again under the premise that nothing
else but reiteration can fix it.
In any other field this is called
neurosis, the record keeps skipping back but the listener thinks it’s going
forwards.
I told my physicist friends well before the
launch that I thought the James Webb would not find small primordial galaxies
in the "early" (distant) universe but galaxies much like the milky
way and other local galaxies it counted for ZERO credibility on my part when it
turned out exactly as I said it would.
I explained that this was going to
happen because the big bang consensus emerged due to of issues of conformity
and social bonding having zero to do with science, but this fell on deaf ears.
The big bang is a CULT belief, you
are joining a GROUP and not adhering to rational science. People who defer from
the consensus are PUNISHED; people who accept the consensus are REWARDED which
is called CONDITIONING. Heretical beliefs are censored, canonical beliefs are
published, its propaganda used to support a publishing empire that uses
COERCION to keep everyone on the same page.
Now they are trying to say that
"early" galaxies are not really large, that it’s larger black holes
at their centers that give us this illusion which they can get away with
because the images are fuzzy, the fuzzier the image the more they take advantage.
Earlier on the Hubble telescope
produced very fuzzy images of distant galaxies so they claimed they could
already see that more distant galaxies were less developed, it was a universal
mantra.
I told my educated friends that I
thought this was due to them reading into fuzzy images what they wanted to see,
just like the claims of UFOs in fuzzy photos, or of Big Foot, or of channels or
even canals on Mars. You can read whatever you like into vague images. I was
assured that these were advanced scientific concepts that went way beyond fuzzy
photos and that I was too ignorant. to appreciate the care that went into the
claims
Yes, they were highly advanced WRONG
scientific concepts that got refuted the minute the James Webb made the images
clearer.
An advanced scientist looking into
the mist sees advanced illusions while an uneducated person looking into the
mist sees uneducated illusions, but everyone looking into the mist sees
whatever illusion they expect to see, that's why they call it MYSTERY.
(mist-ery)
People of all stripes seem to think
that INTELLIGENCE can solve any problem, but many very highly intelligent
people have a personality that makes them conformist followers to the core such
that they are incapable of taking a stand against the majority of their peers.
Many intelligent people never create
or discover anything and a highly intelligent person has recourse to advanced
forms of rationalization that the unintelligent could never manage.
Intelligence helps with every manner of gaslighting.
Innovators are the people who do not
fear standing apart, who do not value consensus for consensus sake as DOES the
vast majority of persons. Curiosity matters far more than intelligence, love of
adventure is what innovators display, the instinct to fit in stands explicitly
in the way of progress, to advance an art or a science requires one to be
oblivious to whether they fit in or not, it’s content that matters to an
innovator, not social status.
If one is intelligent that does not
mean one is independent minded, but if one is independent minded and
intelligent, that is a powerful indicator that one can create and discover new
content that is difficult to arrive at. Intelligence is far more common than an
independent spirit so it’s a huge mistake to conflate intelligence with
independence, some of the least innovative people on earth are very intelligent.
PSI Blog 20240930
Thanks for reading
Infinite Universe Theory! On Medium.com you can subscribe for free to receive
new posts and be part of the “Last Cosmological Revolution.” There you can support PSI financially by
clapping 50 times and responding with your questions.
No comments:
Post a Comment