Tired Light Theory Supports Infinite Universe Theory

 PSI Blog 20241014 Tired Light Theory Supports Infinite Universe Theory

 

Einstein’s Untired Light Theory messes up again with both Wikipedia and Neil deGrasse Tyson being fooled.

 

Intergalactic distance unchanged over time. Photo credit: Giles.[1]

 

Another great question from George Coyne:

 

“In case any of your readers are not familiar with Olbers' paradox (a.k.a. Olbers and Chseauz's paradox), it says that "the darkness of the night sky conflicts with the assumption of an infinite and eternal and static universe. In the hypothetical case that the universe is static, homogenous at a large scale, and populated by an infinite number of stars, any line of sight from Earth must end at the surface of a star and hence the night sky should be completely illuminated and very bright. This contradicts the observed darkness and non-uniformity of the night sky." (Wikipedia)

 

Neil deGrasse Tyson discusses the paradox in this video stating that if the universe is infinite then without expansion the sky would be bright at night:

 

https://www.facebook.com/watch?v=1000071988217197

 

Using your model of a non-expanding infinite universe, what is your solution to Olbers' paradox?”

 

[GB: First of all, I reject Wikipedia’s interjecting the word “static” in their explanation of Olbers’s Paradox. The Infinite Universe is not static. Every portion of it is in motion with respect to other portions. Second of all, the regressive interpretation of the so-called “Paradox” (which it is not) is based on an idealization. Idealizations often are useful, but they are not reality. In this case, Tyson, and others before him, use Einstein’s false assumption light was a massless particle containing perfectly empty space traveling perpetually through perfectly empty space. There is no evidence for perfectly empty space. Einstein’s Untired Light Theory is false and unprecedented. Nothing travels from point A to point B without losing energy.

 

There is no way for anything, including light waves or Einstein’s magical light particles, to travel an infinite distance without losing energy. We see this as a result of Zwicky’s Tired Light Theory[2], which is why the cosmological redshift increases with distance. Redshifted waves have less energy than when they were emitted from distant stars. By the time much of the light from the infinite number of stars in the Infinite Universe reaches us, it has an equilibrium redshift of z=1089, as mentioned in last week’s post.

 

Although this does not “prove” the universe is infinite any more than does the discovery of the 20 trillion galaxies estimated from the JWST photos. But it does get ever closer and those data are from real objects, and not dependent on an ideal particle traveling through ideal perfectly empty space. Rank idealist Tyson’s claim that Olbers proves the universe is expanding is just as moribund as it ever was. On top of that, the figure above shows no expansion between galaxies with time. This is an observation we consider to be one of the falsifications of the Big Bang Theory.

 

Here is another chance for readers to choose between fundamental assumptions that are rational (science) or irrational (religion).]

 

 

PSI Blog 20241014

 

 Thanks for reading Infinite Universe Theory! On Medium.com you can subscribe for free to receive new posts and be part of the “Last Cosmological Revolution.”  There you can support PSI financially by clapping 50 times and responding with your questions.

 

 

 

 

[1] Giles, Douglas, 2023, What if the universe is NOT expanding? Inserting Philosophy, Medium.com, Accessed 20230616 [https://gborc.com/Giles].

[2] Zwicky, F., 1929, On the Redshift of Spectral Lines Through Interstellar Space: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 15, no. 10, p. 773–779. [http://www.pnas.org/content/15/10/773.short].