PSI Blog 20250616 Radiation from Elderly Galaxies Trashes the Big Bang Theory
If the Cosmic Microwave Background is from too fast-forming
galaxies, then it is not the required remnant from the Big Bang.
Thanks to Bill Howell for this heads up:
“Hi Glenn. I just saw this and think you'll find it very
interesting (if you haven't already seen it). Ironically, the video, and the
potential objections to it, doesn't take the next obvious step of attributing
the findings to an infinite Universe. But as with most discoveries in science,
it's about baby steps.”
Thanks also to Seethepattern for producing the video:
New
CMB Discovery Could Shatter the Big Bang Model
In a previous post I mentioned that the CMB (Cosmic
Microwave Background) has a redshift of 1089, while the greatest so far
measured is 14.44 from an “elderly galaxy.” Looking back in space, we actually
are looking back in time. Look far enough, and you are supposed to see what the
beginning of the Big Bang universe was like. According to the Big Bang Theory,
that galaxy was calculated to be only 280 million years old. Our Milky Way
galaxy took 13.6 billion years to form. 280 is way too fast. This major
contradiction has put cosmogonists everywhere into cognitive dissonance. They
have to come up with a 26th ad hoc to save the Big Bang Theory once
again.
As summarized in the video, this first attempt was a failure.
The conundrum is this: the CMB is supposed to be a remnant of the Big Bang.
Most cosmogony calculations of the “evolution of the universe” rely on that 2.7oK
result. Trouble is, the new paper discussed in the video
suggests the 2.7oK is not from the Big Bang, but from those “elderly
galaxies” we have been seeing at the edge of the observed universe. Cosmogonists
can’t have it both ways. They either have to reject the paper or they have to
reject the Big Bang Theory.
I suspect the paper will not receive much attention. So
other, less destructive ad hocs will have to be invented.
BTW: The 2.7oK CMB temperature proves space is
not perfectly empty as Einstein incorrectly assumed when he rejected the aether.
Temperature is the motion of matter. So that means there is matter in outer
space, with aether, the medium for light, being the prime candidate. Per my “Aether
Deceleration Theory” of gravitation,[1]
aether particles in outer space are highly active. I have speculated that their
short-range interparticle velocities could be 50% greater than c.
That would be analogous to the interparticle velocities of nitrogen molecules
in the atmosphere. Their interparticle motion averages 515 m/s, while the
velocity of sound waves in that medium is 343 m/s.
PSI Blog 20250616
Thanks for reading Infinite
Universe Theory! Get your copy of the just-released Second Edition of "The Scientific
Worldview" to see the
step-by-step logic leading to the rational view of the cosmos. Be part of the
“Last Cosmological Revolution,” the demise of the “Last Creation Myth,” and the
age of enlightenment to come. Buy Now.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment