Absurd Spacetime Concept Leads To Wasting Scientific Resources
By George Coyne
Not only do regressive physicists maintain that it is impossible for the universe to exist, they also are convinced that quantum particles “can exist simultaneously in two or more places.” How incredibly weird is that? Does this make any logical or rational sense to anyone other than true believers of the standard QM Copenhagen model? To me it seems profoundly unscientific. These physicists try to deflect any attention from the absurdity of their belief systems by confidently claiming that the universe is very weird. Does anyone think that they would try the same tactic in a court of law if charged with a crime that they had committed? Would they tell the jury that they accepted that their alibi was completely implausible and totally impossible, but nevertheless it is valid and should be believed? Would they argue that it is just due to the nature of the universe that makes it seem that they are guilty when in reality they are innocent? They would only try such a tactic if they were attempting to make a case for an insanity plea.
As a result of the misguided belief in spacetime, there arises the concept of gravity waves which have never been detected despite a great deal of wasted resources in this search. The erroneous claim on March 17, 2014 by astronomers at the Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics that "they had detected and produced the first direct image of gravitational waves across the primordial sky" was later disproved. By January 30, 2015 a news item in Nature stated "Gravitational waves discovery now officially dead."
On the night of December 2, 2015 the European Space agency launched LISA on a mission to make test measurements for a method that will be employed to detect “gravitational waves.” These waves, according to Einstein's predictions, are “ripples in spacetime.” But since spacetime is only imaginary, it does not actually exist, and thus it cannot have ripples.
Glenn Borchardt's neomechanical explanation of gravity as being "produced by variations in aether pressure” is logical and rational. It has the great advantage over the relativity model in that it does not require the irrational concept of spacetime and is consistent with Newton's classical mechanics.