PSI Blog 20210222 What Questions Do You Have About Infinite Universe Theory?
To all my readers:
It should be clear
by now that we have beaten the horse called “Big Bang” to death many times
over. We now await the excuses cosmogonists will dream up when the Webb
telescope discovers galaxies older than their imagined 13.8-billion-year age of
their finite universe. We should all get a kick out of that.
Now I would like to
switch from the negative to the positive like I did in the second half of “Infinite
Universe Theory.” Like all theories, it needs continuous development. We need
more predictions that can be tested. We need to resolve any paradoxes or
contradictions that I am unaware of. This is where you come in. Many heads are
better than one, so I would like to answer any questions you can think of.
Makes no difference whether they are basic or advanced.
Each week I will pick the best question and answer it on Monday.
Think of it this
way: What if the universe really was infinite and eternal? How would that
realization change your interpretations of natural phenomena? For that matter,
how would it change your life? Here is one way: Prizes will be awarded for the
best questions. Good luck!
Posts
3 comments:
I highly enjoyed your book Infinite Universe Theory. Thank you for your stunning and informative work. Now on to my question, which doesn't directly relate to the universe being infinite, but is connected.
This might sound crazy to you, depending on what you’ve read, but in my research I’ve become pretty convinced that both extraterrestrials and humans have mastered anti-gravity, allowing UFOs, both alien and manmade, to fly in ways that defy conventional physics. Based on your theory of gravity, Aether Deceleration Theory, can you speculate on a possible way to achieve anti-gravity?
The past refers to motion that has occurred, and the future represents motion that has not yet occurred. If "now" is considered in terms of nuclear rotations in an atom, then how many, if any, transpire in the period that is considered now. There are 5 billion trillion nuclear rotations per second. Some presentists would argue that there are no nuclear rotations in the now because the present has a duration of zero. That requires the absence of motion because time is the motion of matter. Without motion there can be no matter. Thus, this leads to the conclusion that in the present there is no matter. Without matter there is no universe. So, for the present to be a reality, there can be no universe and no reality, which means there is no possibility of a present that exists or occurs. My question is: Does the concept of “now” have any reality apart from our thought? If it does, how would you define it?
Glenn, I have a question for you regarding an aether paper by Joseph Levy titled “Is the Aether Entrained by the Motion of Celestial Bodies? What do the Experiments Tell Us?”
Levy sees the necessity to include aether in formulating physics theories in writing: "It is difficult, indeed, to accept that a “vacuum”, endowed with physical properties such as permittivity and permeability may be empty. The ability of such an empty vacuum to transmit electromagnetic waves is also doubtful." However, I am certain that you will find many errors with his paper. What areas do you find to be the most problematic with his concepts? Would you please critique it so that your readers will better understand how your theoretical perspective concerning aether and its role in gravitation differs significantly from Levy’s. Thanks!
Here is the link to a pdf of his paper:
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.1885.pdf
Post a Comment